02/02 - Stretching Saturday!

like watching the video.

if you watched the video, it would show you how.

https://turkerview.com/assets/TurkerViewJS.mp4

 

i think ranting wastes more time than the video

 

I like that idea. Let's all email them and tell them to do that

 

well ranting or not, when you go to look at others reviews you should be able to write a review from there too but you can't......whoever wrote this stuff didn't think it through very well.

 

if @Randomacts is successful at getting Remesh to go back to Masters, you might have a chance tbh

 

Thomas Graeber [A3K35EFCYRCPA0] 30-Minute Study: Earn $3 Reward Plus Possibility of a Bonus - $3.00 | PANDA

Fair

Unrated

Unrated

$9.35 / hour
00:19:15 / completion time

​

Pros:
Long. No progress bar. Would be more worth it if you receive the randomly determined bonus, which I did, but my bonus was still 0.00.

Cons:
Maths. If you're good at math you can do it in your head, otherwise get a calculator. It's not hard math.

Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Masters DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 80; Location EqualTo US;

To read Thomas Graeber's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Title: Pinterest - Pinterest Ad Relevance in Search [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Pinterest [AURHK491L2LH6]
TurkerView: [ $23.91 / hour ]
Description: You will log in to Pinterest to complete simple tasks.
Duration: 00:20:00
Available: 0
Reward: $0.40
Qualifications:

• sofia_accuracy DoesNotExist [ Request | How to Use ]
• Scammers DoesNotExist [ Request | How to Use ]

[3IR329NZ8ZG7L6DPLN7I98J3YWNK2P]​

 

Have you tried TO? Maybe reddit? I think you may be more at home there.

 

John Sheng [A01147191PN2K1V3FGXOU] Answer a survey and learn about a model - $5.00 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$23.84 / hour
00:12:35 / completion time

​

Pros:
Good pay

Cons:
Reading about math

Qualifications: US High School Graduate EqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) > 90; Location EqualTo US;

To read John Sheng's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

yeah not a bad suggestion, just think it would be more productive to make it in a less contentious manner. but i think the reason for that is to control for people who don't do hits but proceed to review them a la TO

 

@ChrisTurk is awful at UX but the reason that you can't do that is TO.

Look at how useless TO reviews are because you aren't forced to review with proof of doing the hit.

 

You're supposed to have completed the hit tracked by TVJS before you review, it's the whole premise of TV so people can't leave random reviews.

 

but I want to leave random 1 bombs!! let me!!!