05/06 - Seven Ate Nine Monday

Today is cat tax day.

Pay up.

 

I'll make my check payable to @Chaelian

 

GEMS Lab [A11T8FV5IJG5KU] Short psychology survey(~ 5 minutes) - $0.75 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$31.76 / hour
00:01:25 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Exc: [1262781795-145019] DoesNotExist ; SurveyGroup [1115] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location In US;

To read GEMS Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

I'm sending someone over to extract your kidney.

 

New Requester Profile!

Jessica Hample [A3QSGTLNG44M97] Parent's Attitudes to Science and Health - $1.00 | PANDA

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$13.53 / hour
00:04:26 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
Screener

Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

To read Jessica Hample's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Consumer Panels [AUBFIGBO24FQ1] Rate companies from various categories - $0.50 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$36.00 / hour
00:00:50 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

To read Consumer Panels's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Ethan Perez [A3VVLBSQF8556V] Guess the answer! - $3.10 $3.10 bonus | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$25.77 / hour
00:14:26 / completion time

​

Pros:
bonus
instant approval

Cons:
It requires critical thinking and reading. If you aren't a fast reader, you wont get the bonus or a good hourly rate

Qualifications: poor performance DoesNotExist ; Location In AU, CA, GB, NZ, US; max time DoesNotExist ; race_raw/test.human_eval DoesNotExist ;

To read Ethan Perez's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Consumer Panels [AUBFIGBO24FQ1] Rate companies from various categories - $0.50 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$25.00 / hour
00:01:12 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
10 minute timer

Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

To read Consumer Panels's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Jeffrey Friedman [A3MA9NWI8ALQYK] Politics survey (3-5 mins, $0.50) - $0.50 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$26.87 / hour
00:01:07 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 100; HIT approval rate (%) > 97; Location EqualTo US;

To read Jeffrey Friedman's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Jeffrey Friedman [A3MA9NWI8ALQYK] Politics survey (3-5 mins, $0.50) - $0.50 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$24.00 / hour
00:01:15 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 100; HIT approval rate (%) > 97; Location EqualTo US;

To read Jeffrey Friedman's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

J. Robert Parker [A2EHKO7Q5LN7ZN] 5-10 minute survey (requires reading multiple scenarios) - $0.50 | PANDA

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$10.59 / hour
00:02:50 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 500; HIT approval rate (%) >= 97; Location EqualTo US;

To read J. Robert Parker's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Consumer Panels [AUBFIGBO24FQ1] Rate companies from various categories - $0.50 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$21.95 / hour
00:01:22 / completion time

​

Pros:
-great hourly

Cons:
-cant copy pasta the code which appears to be the running trend with these
-short timer

Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

To read Consumer Panels's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Jeffrey Friedman [A3MA9NWI8ALQYK] Politics survey (3-5 mins, $0.50) - $0.50 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$27.27 / hour
00:01:06 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 100; HIT approval rate (%) > 97; Location EqualTo US;

To read Jeffrey Friedman's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Are people using a "copy pasta" script to speed up the copying and pasting process? I didn't have any trouble double clicking to highlight and then using the keyboard to copy and paste.

Now I feel stupid for maybe wasting a 1-2 seconds for each code.

 

GEMS Lab [A11T8FV5IJG5KU] PERCEPTION AND JUDGMENT (~ 6 minutes) - $0.50 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$20.69 / hour
00:01:27 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Exc: [4632785-144481] DoesNotExist ; Location In US;

To read GEMS Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Uh, more nicely stated than what RA said the exports are about the easiest way to put a human in the loop for QA outside someone DM'ing me random user profiles (which is actually most effective, but rarer). I'm actually more likely to stop exporting from old timers who I know only screw up occasionally lol. But the exporting part of the review process itself has a lot of if statements now & I prefer not to touch it w/o a compelling reason to tbh since exporting isn't really "important".

Review "bombing" has basically no real effect on anything, I find it amusing at best, and it's usually as simple as DM'ing someone as a fix.. but watching @ThisPoorGuy flail around thread banning the guy every day instead is amusing and most of his data is "correct" - he has 78 reviews above avg comparison time, 47 below, and only 11 slow out of range & 3 fast out of range which is okayish (a little higher on the slow OOR than I'd like but lower sample size atm).