07/11 - Throughput Thursday!

You should generally DM it so it's not on Google

Don't take me away from my data woman

 

Isn't that always the case? Not gonna stop people from going on an IRB crusade, though.

 

Not always. I've definitely seen requesters just mass reject everyone because they thought the data quality overall was too poor, and then relaunched the entire study.

I don't blame people for going to the IRB over arbitrary time stuff though. I would hope people still at least contact the requester and give them a chance before doing that though.

 

Cornell Researcher [A1ZDO9K0RM16QH] Answer a survey (~1 min) about farmers - $0.50 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$38.30 / hour
00:00:47 / completion time

​

Pros:
Masters

Cons:

Qualifications: Masters Exists ;

To read Cornell Researcher's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Roseanne McManus [A1X3J6TFCE1B3Y] Answer a survey about foreign policy opinions - $2.00 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$18.46 / hour
00:06:30 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
A little writing, but not experiential.

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 1000; HIT approval rate (%) > 98; Already completed my survey DoesNotExist ; Location EqualTo US;

To read Roseanne McManus's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Title: Answer a survey about foreign policy opinions | PANDA
Requester: Roseanne McManus [A1X3J6TFCE1B3Y]
TurkerView: [ $25.25 / hour ]
Description: This is a research study by Professor Roseanne McManus at Penn State University. It is estimated to take 6-10 minutes, although I have allotted more time in case of interruptions. Participants must be US residents who are 18 or older.
Duration: 30 Min
Available: 0
Reward: $2.00
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThan 1000,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 98,
• Already completed my survey DoesNotExist
• Location EqualTo US,

[3DMF13TAOYLOU24SGCUQ7XRWFTLUJK]​

 

It looks like it was on the University of Buffalo qualtrics, not sure if there were an IRB form. But I'd reach out to the requester before you go the IRB route.

 

I got a rejection from Patience too! I guess I didn't have enough...patience.

 

You need to work on some better batches.

 

3x slower than average (not at all surprised here) data isn't really that important.

 

There was IRB info. I have a screenshot.

 

NerdLab Lab Group [ATMRMLDNGYDJT] Short Survey on Social Perceptions(~ 6 minutes) - $0.70 | PANDA

Generous

<24 hours

Unrated

$22.50 / hour
00:01:52 / completion time

Approved! ​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Exc: [5075487-158143] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs >= 500; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location In US;

To read NerdLab Lab Group's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Thomas Walichiewicz [AF5QY8LGSCBH5] A study about financial usability / comprehension (~5 minutes) - $4.00 | PANDA

Generous

<24 hours

Unrated

$132.11 / hour
00:01:49 / completion time

Approved! ​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 0; HIT approval rate (%) > 90; Completed a version of survey already DoesNotExist ; Location EqualTo US;

To read Thomas Walichiewicz's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Didn't realize asking publicly for an email was a no-no. My bad. But I would appreciate a DM if anyone has a way to contact them directly.

 

You're fine.. it's not a big deal at all lol, although apparently a hot topic today

 

it's the quantity of data that counts not the quality

 

I should look before making ma funnies

 

All hail @AMindAtTurk

 

imagine being a slowpoke

 

There is no way you're working at optimal speeds with a table that isn't decked out in red flames tbh