09/15 - Serene Sunday!

Chau Nguyen [AZSVTL4H94JI2] Future travel plan - $0.30 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$38.57 / hour
00:00:28 / completion time

​

Pros:
Single page

Cons:

Qualifications: Location NotEqualTo IN; Answered travel plan survey DoesNotExist ;

To read Chau Nguyen's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

I'll have you know I'm drinking tequila tonight instead of wine to save calories. Also, I have a small piece of glass stuck in my foot.

@ChrisTurk

 

Not my fault

 

Prove it.0

 

i love me some julio jones

 

New Requester Profile!

Iain [A1OFID2Y1DI9FA] Food reward learning games - $5.00 | PANDA

Fair

Unrated

Unrated

$13.40 / hour
00:22:23 / completion time

​

Pros:
$5

Cons:
God it was long and boring.
Semi passive... you just have to mash your keyboard and look every few seconds to have a piece of info.
The questionnaire before the "game" is way way way too long.

Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 0; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95;

To read Iain's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Title: Come up with similar dialogues with a chatbot | PANDA
Requester: Emily Wilson [A19Y8N1023GB2R]
TurkerView: [ $16.54 / hour ]
Description: Your job is to come up with a similar line of dialogue in a conversation between a person and a chatbot.
Duration: 20 Min
Available: 1
Reward: $0.15
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95
• Location In US

[32JEHGQ0RJWR0BIF4J4RZP8MERYU8Y]​

sad

 

Matthew [A1DQ0N82IXD5I6] Extremely fast and easy survey about your attitudes - $0.05 | PANDA

Fair

Unrated

Unrated

$7.50 / hour
00:00:24 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

To read Matthew's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

@Squatcobbler

Congrats!

 

So what's up with some survey hits with bad links like

Code:

http://https://whatever.qualtrics.com...

and that obviously doesn't work so you take off the http:// and you have

Code:

https://whatever.qualtrics.com...

But then it still doesn't work because (strangely) something's amiss with the https://
... it may look to be correct but, when you get one of these bad links,
the https:// doesn't work. That's odd. What weirdness produces these broken links?

Easy enough (as most of you surely know), just delete and retype the https:// part and then it works.

So, no problem for us, just a small inconvenience ...
although these broken links do throw off some newcomers who don't realize it's easy to fix.

 

ikr

 

Wow, just got booted out of the hit by Vikalpa Research. 12 minutes in and I received this message:

Sorry!

Our research requires a certain high level of accuracy. Either you weren't paying attention or aren't fluent enough in English for our needs. The survey will end now to save your time - you can close this window and abandon this HIT. You won't get paid, but you will not receive a rejection.

Thank you for your time.

Lol, I'm very fluent in English but many of the words they wanted definitions for, I had never heard of. In that case, you are told in the instructions to mark "I don't know." At least one third to one half are not commonly used at all and I would only expect to see in 100-year-old books.

 

I probably should try that hit. I like old words. They've become almost a hobby for me. I've been spending some of my spare time compiling a personal glossary of obscure and obsolete words.

 

Dinnah is ready if in the hood

 

what is it

 

Well, good luck. Some were not spelled correctly and may have been attention checks, I don't know. Should have just looked them up instead laugh out loud. Croothly? Weir? Augured? I maintained a 15/20 so I guess they're looking for near-perfection.

I retook the survey using incog and passed using the same answers. What the hell?

 

rabbit