06/16 - Tag Team Tuesday

Sven Mikolon [A1BM2FBNU0JCZW] Study about donation intentions(~ 2 minutes) - $0.40 | PANDA

Low

Unrated

Unrated

$5.22 / hour
00:04:36 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 19 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 5000; Exc: [-292289514-227364] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98;

To read Sven Mikolon's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Jake [A2TLCOX8XIBJ2I] Choice Experiments and Cognitive Tests - $0.25 | PANDA

Low

Unrated

Unrated

$6.92 / hour
00:02:10 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 7 minutes ago)
Qualifications: GDP-Previous DoesNotExist ;

To read Jake's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Give us a 5 minute heads up before you submit it and let it go out into the wild again?

 

Title: Answer three surveys and tell us about how you use texting and video calls | Accept Requester: HCI Lab UCSC [A35BIQ7ZD7U2C7] Contact TV: [Hrly=$18.92] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=5.00] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=5.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=8] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 7.50 Duration: 5:00:00 Available: 1 Description: You will be asked to fill out three personality surveys and answer two sets of short answer questions to see how you think about and use texting and video calls in your life. Qualifications: Employment Status: Employed full time (35+ hours per week) EqualTo 1; Total approved HITs GreaterThan 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.6.13​

 

Title: Pre-survey for music information(~7 mins) | PANDA
Requester: Hiroki Masuda [AFJYQLMQQ4B8B]
TurkerView: [ $10.60 / hour ]
Description: Listen for the sounds and count the note onsets of sax. The work provides 'raw waveforms ' that assist in accomplishing the work.
Duration: 60 Min
Available: 0
Reward: $1.00
Qualifications:

[3EWXWOT88QIOHJEF6AT4QKOCNU25PH]​

 

I've adjusted my earlier rating for this requester.

Earlier today, I made assumptions regarding the intent of the requester that were not fair. Insofar as I have the capacity to experience frustration, I was frustrated by the rejections provided by the requester, and by the terse rejection messages included with the rejection. As the rejections all occurred relatively quickly, as did the approved HIT worked on in the batch, I assumed the requester was both available for and would provide immediate feedback. When I didn't receive immediate feedback, I provided a review that included hyperbolic statements. My followup comments, made here, were more appropriate, but still were unfair in terms of tone.

The requester in this case sent an email asking me to change portions of my review, which they felt were unfair. Reviewing both the information I provided in my review, and the content of the email the requester sent to me, I've decided to adjust the review to better fit the situation. While I still feel the rejections were unfair, I admit it was inappropriate to use the hyperbolic language I used in the review, and have made changes that I feel more closely reflect a fair review. Additionally, I've changed the rating regarding fairness of pay, which has always been fair when HITs are accepted, and the communication score, which is good considering the time the requester took to provide their email response.

In changing my review, the requester specifically asked that I point out their use of a qualification does not constitute a block for all work from the requester, and so, although I would still refer to the qualification as a qualblock, I want to make it clear that the requester did not specifically block my workerID, but instead used a qualification to prevent additional work on their batch. Whether this will apply to future HITs published by the requester is unclear.

Additionally, I've asked the requester to review those rejected HITs in the hopes of having some or all of the rejections overturned, and to discuss specifically what about my work on their HITs. I should have done this earlier today, and given the requester time to respond before leaving negative comments in my review which could negatively impact the perception of the requester in this community or in the broader community of workers who use TV comments when deciding what tasks to work on.

I haven't yet received an answer to my request, but regardless of whether the requester overturns or upholds the rejections, I think it's important to make my best effort to correct the record. If I receive a favorable or an unfavorable response to my request, I'll let everybody here know.

 

Too long; didn't read.

 

you’re a good person/robot. Humanity could learn a thing or two about learning and growing from you. I like you

 

They got rejected, got upsetty, made kinda rude-ish(barely) review, emailed request, talked like adults and figured it out, updating review to not be so upset and more honest after the heat of the moment.

 

I only read non-fiction stories.

 

Brian [ASM3O15S6TI1C] Answer a survey about your opinions on COVID-19. - $1.00 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$20.57 / hour
00:02:55 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 1000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location EqualTo US;

To read Brian's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

MLRPT rejected me too- but TV isn't letting me review/won't show up on browser either lol
But there was ONE review also, so I wanted mine documented as well


(I sent them a dispute about letting me know how I answered wrong/whatever so I can learn. Like, softly telling them to "prove it")

 

Brian [ASM3O15S6TI1C] Answer a survey about your opinions on COVID-19. - $1.00 | PANDA

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$12.12 / hour
00:04:57 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 1000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location EqualTo US;

To read Brian's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Nicole Kashian [A378SDS3FA3V1S] Answer a survey about your experience with the coronavirus pandemic - $1.85 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$16.44 / hour
00:06:45 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Very Low (HIT Last Seen: 2 hours ago)
Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

To read Nicole Kashian's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

PE $11.71. Time to fire up Skyrim and start playing so PandaCrazy can catch the $7 and $20 HITs I'm trying to catch.

 

Title: Simplify sentences for non-native English Speakers | PANDA
Requester: Zoka Lab [A29AGNWMX24PER]
TurkerView: [ $10.56 / hour ]
Description: Rewrite sentences so that they are easier to read and understand by non-native English speakers.
Duration: 60 Min
Available: 50
Reward: $0.40
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThan 1000,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95,
• ZokaLab - Maximum HITs Submitted Simplification DoesNotExist
• ZokaLab - Passed Simplification Qualification Test Exists
• Location EqualTo US,

[3P6UG6V26BLZ365QC7L10OEK2VQ4NU]​

 

Will do. It has a three day timer so I probably won't mess with it until Thursday.

 

Dickens Lab [AGY04AHG8MOMC] Emotional Reactions to Short Passages - $2.00 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$23.45 / hour
00:05:07 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Terrible (HIT Last Seen: 7 hours ago)
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) > 90; Location EqualTo US;

To read Dickens Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​