10/25 - Winged Wednesday!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_sand_bed

 

I've heard of it but am not 100% sure of where it is

 

.... *adds to block list*

 

Not today surveys, not today.

 

Changed my review to reflect my rejection as well.

 

Goddamn it. Did a survey without accepting it, went through it, and now it's gone. I'm usually anal about making sure I accept them too. Hoping to catch on panda.

 

Slow morning. Im binge watching GMM right now to pass the time.

 

Just message the requester. Squeaky wheel gets the grease.

 

Yeah I will after I see if I can catch it.

 

Woo! Caught it!

 

Title: LUC Research Study | PANDA Requester: Beatriz Reiner [A3SRGLMGEOR48V] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] Description: If you volunteer, you will be asked read a fictional dialogue from a sexual assault court case and anonymously respond to two short questionnaires. On average, completing this study takes 15 minutes. Time: 40 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Gender - Female is 1; Total approved HITs is not less than 50; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US;

 

Mechanical Turk Research [A1M26OMBQUBA0Q] Study on health and workplace environments - $2.00 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unacceptable

$ / hour
00:00:00 / completion time

Pros:
Cons: The survey ended abruptly and auto-submitted itself. The requester rejected a few days later saying that "sorry you didn't meet our criteria". Their email is invalid too, no communication whatsoever.

To read Mechanical Turk Research's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

I forgot to mark this as REJECTED. Change it now. Also, I marked it as an unfair rejection. It would've been fair, but they sent out the email and asked for you to complete what they sent, which I did.

If you don't know how Market Research works, trust me on this I used to work in it. They NEED a full pool of participants, not just qualified participants. So by sending out that survey and having us complete it via email, they got their pool of 500 surveys in hopes of finding maybe 50 qualified participants. I'd have been much more okay with the straight rejection, than, oh we goofed, fill this out, and oh, we're still rejecting you. Cause I don't care a bit about a rejection, give me a break. But this isn't how you conduct above board research and this is a legitimate company. If this was an academic survey, I'd report it to their IRB.

 

Title: Cause Related Campaigns(~ 10 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Ernan Haruvy [A1UGVGUQRE790J] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fast: 4.00] Description: You will answer a survey and rate slogans Time: 55 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Exc: [-213140698-61987] has not been granted; Location is one of: US;

 

Mechanical Turk Research [A1M26OMBQUBA0Q] Study on health and workplace environments - $2.00 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unacceptable

$ / hour
00:00:00 / completion time

Pros:
Cons: - Survey auto-submitted itself at the end
- Requester then emailed workers and gave them a link to do it again, in which most of us were then disqualified
- Rejected because the original survey was broken, didn't screen anyone, and didn't qualify for the emailed version
- Email doesn't work

To read Mechanical Turk Research's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Oct 23rd - sometime around 5pm I took it