08/28 - Tranquility Tuesday!

just sent an email to PickFu guys, will let you know if they answer.

 

Title: Take a survey about learning things on YouTube [ $15.88 | $18.62 ] PANDA
Requester: uxmturk [A31V2G70WX75L4]
TurkerView: [ $19.79 / hour ]
Description: -
Duration: 01:00:00
Available: 0
Reward: $0.75
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90,
• Location EqualTo US,

[30MQSQ7CAU71KS8YZFCTSZJFFH7TBV]​

 

Title: Provide financial advice [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Duke Center for Behavioral Economics [A14RDIKJG0V5TD]
TurkerView: [ $21.38 / hour ]
Description: You will have a chance to provide financial advice to someone. Your advice will help us understand how to give financial advice in the future.
Duration: 04:00:00
Available: 0
Reward: $1.50
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 80,
• Location EqualTo US,

[3LNJUJ6UPARY1R1Z1DNY799OATTRE4]​

 

Title: Study rating how interesting and important different sections of text are in learning about weather [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Alexander Johnson [A30JCBWQSRE6Z]
TurkerView: [ $22.90 / hour ]
Description: Rate how interesting and important sentences are for learning about weather (PLEASE READ FULL INSTRUCTIONS)
Duration: 04:00:00
Available: 0
Reward: $4.00
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThan 500,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95,
• Location EqualTo US,

[3VVLLQBON7DGMYSIHLW0LS57F4I7QF]​

 

Thanks. I never saw that thread since it's not technically directed at me and didn't know that was possible for requesters. I'll make sure to direct requesters to it when appropriate.

 

You see, I fear sending rude things to requesters! What's worse though? Bots or assholes?

 

I don't use it but thanks for the headsup.

 

I just sent a similar email but they will not understand that I am a bot;

Waazzzuuup Beeyooaacccths,

You dawgs, it seems I got a rejection from you mafakas. It is not first my rejection though. The number of my rejections is soooo high that, my rejections rate is similar to yoo mama's rejection rate.

Reverse it or %$#%%#$#%#%#

duck my vuvuzela

 

How are you so fucking fast on the draw for those gifs? Where do you keep them for speed loading?!

 

So I was just giving Amazon back the money in my payments account and it crossed my mind that Amazon should be able to tell that someone is not a bot if they consistently buy random stuff on Amazon using their payments account. I buy varied stuff from the special mouthwash my kid needs for braces to 50s style dresses, and I just ordered an outdoor rug and a folding table today.

Not that I want to jinx my account, but if I got suspended (or anyone like me) and they thought I was a bot or a fake account, wouldn't pointing them to my extremely prolific purchasing history (and the fact that I've had an Amazon account since 1999 and recently discovered I can still go back that far and see all the books I used to buy from them back then) be a good defense to being called a bot?

My reasoning can often get caught in a logic loop, so anyone want to point out the flaws in my thinking here?

 

Both are bad. Kill them with kindness.

 

That sounds like the logic a robot would use

 

I am a refined shit poster, I've been honing my talent since 4chan and SomethingAwful. What you see here isn't even my final form.

 

Sorry, not my M.O.

 

Regular Amazon CS cannot see your MTurk account, it likely applies both ways and no one dealing with MTurk has any clue about the rest of your Amazon account history.

 

not like my logic

 

you make a good point. you da real mvp.