01/30 - Weather Wednesday!

a few days ago, I became rejection free for more than 45 days.

 

Title: Article Recommendation Study(~ 40 minutes) | PANDA
Requester: Stanford GSB Behavioral Lab [A3OSXTUM1QEXNY]
TurkerView: [ $14.18 / hour ]
Description: Earn $4 for a 40 min study! In this survey, in addition to answering some questions about yourself, you will answer questions about approximately 40 news articles posted on twitter. You will also answer questions about one specific article. Please take your time and answer all questions honestly.
Duration: 360 Min
Available: 1
Reward: $4.00
Qualifications:

• Exc: [126955-126366] DoesNotExist
• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1000
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 96
• Location In US

[38FT9G80DL71YR7ZC0RAB1JDHM4LHW]​

This? I'm returning this because I already did it.

 

But I'm Jewish.

 

Some people spent almost 2 hours one one of the $10 ones. They found a way -,- lol

 

Jonathan Lieberman [A255UD4AY616XX] Answer a survey about your opinions - $0.50 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$38.30 / hour
00:00:47 / completion time

Rejected!
Requester Feedback: Sorry, you didn't qualify for this survey.​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

To read Jonathan Lieberman's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

that was a really long trip to the potty

 

10 objects go

coat, shirt, tie, knot, collar, neck, hair ... ? ? ? ? ? ?

 

I was looking for it

 

Yup, just got the rejection.

 

person

 

Start tagging the atoms that would make up the materials.

 

Shadow. Pinstripes. Uhh....Seam?

 

human

 

Replace image

 

air, couch, stitches

 

Nothing says "I apologize" like doing nothing to rectify the situation.

 

I went a bit wild with attributes on some of mine, but definitely only did 9 objects on some. I usually "padded" the connections a little for those. Some are just --- I had one with a single bird, standing on dirt. That one was fun.

I only got bonused on 4 of the 9 I had pending, and never more than $2, so the whole "bonus for good work" is sort of crap.

Some of the people who were rejected seem like good, diligent workers, so I'm finding this surprising. If I were one (or, if I become one; I just caught one, but tossed it back, because I'm busy with other stuff) my questions would be, "Have you looked at my data? Does it look like nonsense?" and "So you're just throwing away 3% of the work you get without even looking at it?" and probably, "Can you go look at mine and reverse the rejection?"

And then, I'd call the number listed in the contact info in the HIT.

The instructions in the hit say it's "OK" if you can't find many connections. It doesn't specify a minimum of attributes to fill in (I've done anywhere from 1 to 5, depending, and I'm finding new things all the time, like 'cylindrical' is one of my current favorites...) and you can't advance below 9 objects.

tl;dr It really sounds like the rejections are some old bullshit, so I feel for the folks getting it. I'm surprised I haven't, given the final one I did in last night's batch, I only did 9 objects per, 14 connections per, and average 3 attributes.

My read of what @SunlitSunflower just posted is they just scripted something, without accounting for their own bloody rules. I hope ya'll can get some more info as well as the rejections reversed. Thanks for sharing and keeping us updated.

 

Boron.

 

What about saying that in a sarcastic voice while eating a bacon cheeseburger with way too much bbq sauce on it?

 

Title: A short research on politicians' statements [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Yusaku Horiuchi [A10E4S1REFC2TB]
TurkerView: [ $ / hour ]
Description: This research survey contains questions about your background and opinion on statements made by politicians.
Duration: 01:00:00
Available: 1
Reward: $0.50
Qualifications:

• Location EqualTo US,

[37CCAM3CQL4FYO7PWMSV84IFRMCIDE]​