02/19 - Twin Tuesday!

Inattentive or unreliable worker; failed 11% of attention checks
Nah, missed ACs, especially that many, is a valid rejection reason

 

Greetings from Amazon Mechanical Turk,

You've received a bonus from Jonathan Libgober for work related to 3MGHRFQY2MM3XXXWOL269PA3GKH0YL.
The value of your bonus is: $1.00 USD

The Requester included this note:
Thank you

I envy you guys who got real bonuses from this hit...

 

Not a good idea because that would throw off @ChrisTurk whole system, but I will tell you don't worry about competing. There's some people in here that are wizards, and we are all different and work at our own pace. Just keep on keepin my friend. you're doing great!!

 

Kay Carr [A46ZND31MEF1P] Answer a 5 minute opinion survey (Survey 57) - There is 1 screener question - Only take survey once. - $2.00 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$36.73 / hour
00:03:16 / completion time

​

Pros:
Very quick survery
I added some names so it took me a bit longer
Probably can shave .45 seconds or so off if you don't add anything.

Cons:

Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) > 94; Location EqualTo US;

To read Kay Carr's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

I thought the requestor left this in his feedback! I'm sorry I didn't mean the laughing face.................

 

Kay Carr [A46ZND31MEF1P] Answer a 5 minute opinion survey (Survey 57) - There is 1 screener question - Only take survey once. - $2.00 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$46.75 / hour
00:02:34 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
Some of Req's hits have a low pass rate screener but the pay rate offsets the times you get screened out

Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) > 94; Location EqualTo US;

To read Kay Carr's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

100% agree but if they're certain they didn't miss this many then it is a valuable gripe.

 

FAA-HSG [A2AE4L800ADJMS] Answer a 10-minutes survey about Leadership & Cultural Transformation in Agile Environments - $2.40 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$23.87 / hour
00:06:02 / completion time

​

Pros:
The layout was different and could of been done
in a more concise manner. Would of gone even
faster.

Cons:
A bit bubbly

Qualifications: Job Function - Management EqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) > 50; Location In AT, AU, BE, CA, CH, CL, CZ, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HU, IE, IL, IS, IT, JP, LU, MX, NL, NO, NZ, PL, PT, SE, TR, US; Completed My Survey Already DoesNotExist ;

To read FAA-HSG's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Appreciate you! I wouldn't actually but I still feel so ridiculous seeing other completion times. Especially because I am only a new TV Turker, not a new Turker in general

 

I'm a pretty quick reader and sometimes I'm like what on God's green earth is that time??

 

Title: Query generation (EN) [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: SNIPS [A2YTQTCXVDV7BG]
TurkerView: [ $15.41 / hour ]
Description: We'd like to find out how you would naturally make requests to an intelligent voice assistant. We'll provide you with the main objective of the query, and a list of segments to incorporate into the query.
Duration: 00:05:00
Available: 1
Reward: $0.30
Qualifications:

[3DNUJHYFURJB8IK3NNGPB7JU6D1P2P]​

 

Any good scripts for these shitty Z's out there ?

 

Most of the time, people swear they couldn't of missed the AC. There's just no way....oh the requester sent a screenshot...I did miss it. It happens. Sometimes requesters are forgiving of a human error here and there.
But 11%? Where other people are getting approved and the ACs were insane easy unless you were half assing it? Be honest with yourself before you attempt pitchforks, people

 

You will be asked to rate words for how much they refer to internal experiences in a scake of 1 to 7

High quality spelling!

 

Good point. I'm an honest idiot so I don't think about this scenario often. lol. Maybe I need to be fired from the #pitchforkcrew but honestly it's the only I have going for me in life. Please don't fire me my soft fluffy furry friend!

 

The 11% was literally ONE HIT out of the NINE I did. That's why the number appears to be high. I'm ok with a rejection on that specific HIT, fine. But to mass reject all of them and then in email tell me they question my reliability and that I admit to being prone to misclicks which is not at all what I said in my email to them?

 

In a batch? Where you misclick on ONE of 9 HITs? The % is high because of her low # of completed HITs. If she'd done 20 HITs the % would be much lower.

11% across 100 HITs would most def be grounds for a mass rejection. In a sample size of < 10 HITs that's pretty dumb IMO.

 

Edinburgh Language Research [A2O4KLPLHO8FZK] Continue stories for linguistic research! [Task ID: "NATURE", don't take this HIT if you've already done a "NATURE" HIT] - $5.00 | PANDA

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$11.52 / hour
00:26:03 / completion time

​

Pros:
Complete the next sentence-fairly easy
Only 56 of them to type.
This can be done much quicker if you are into writing

Cons:
Slow time due to lack of coffee

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 1000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location EqualTo US;

To read Edinburgh Language Research's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

It's 1 question missed out of 9 which is why the number seems to be skewed and make it seem like I wasn't paying attention. My biggest gripe is the fact that they then in email told me they question my reliability because I asked if they wouldn't reject at least the ones I hadn't missed....

 

Title: Answer surveys about Crowdfunding Campaigns [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Sanorita Dey [A248HV3SVUD6NE]
TurkerView: [ $11.00 / hour ]
Description: We want to know your opinion about crowdfunding campaigns.
Duration: 00:05:00
Available: 1
Reward: $0.00
Qualifications:

[37CCG24EHY6QYPXLXHTXZXXUTNJZRF]​