03/26 - Swooping in Sunday!

or something I see this one saying...

 

I didn't realize my avatar was damn near invisible on the dark theme

 

And said Seducer smells like Larry Czonka

 

I thought you just liked black boxes

 

Wut?

 

I changed the theme to light for a second to look at yours and now I'm blinded. MY EYES! How do any of you use this?

 

This unfinished limerick is disturbing me.

My willie is made for her Wonka?

 

I agreed there can be no absolute data when relying upon humans.

Haha this has gotten to an almost comical point. Seems like you took some of my last as some sort of pun towards you. Harping on the actual numbers was not the point of my statement "3.5/5 communication would be 70% and with 5 bombs I can see you believing that it would be closer to 60%." Was in response you taking an acceptable amount of latitude in how you interpreted the 3.5/5 communication rating when seeing a certain number of 5 bombs within the ratings. However, I can see where by you making such a statement to then be quoted back to you and a response such as mine could unnerve a less foundationed person within the mturk community. I find it funny for you to think that I was making a pun at your expense, it somewhat shocks my perception of you (at least from your work).

With the limited number of reviews on TO2 which I believe it stands at 149 now 150 total by the recent reviews page it would not take much to skew that data. Compared to how many reviews are on TO and how many years did it take to amass that number of reviews?

I am glad they have stated their intentions for TO and the wealth of data that is has amassed, but I am not a fanboy for either to be completely honest and we will see what happens. As I previously stated TO2 is ripe to be gamed with so few data points (reviews in total and reviews per requester) and while TO is not great either it still has a weight of data to prevent that. As for flawed data, I believe I saw a capture of from TO2 for 411 Richmond with a $1.80/hr pay and recommended but hey if that reviewer can cover the power bill/cable/internet and the like with $1.80/hr, more power to 'em.

Anything you find wrong with these statements?

 

https://turkerhub.com/threads/03-26-swooping-in-sunday.298/page-34#post-117257

 

Most of the time I'm using f.lux, but I have that set to switch off for ESO, which is taking forever to load, so I was switching back to the forum, and, well, my eyes

 

Secret Agent Fio!

 

I think I should have the Seducer of HIT's badge

 

I try to only nut the duck up a few days a week. Any more than that and the duck gets cranky.

 

I think I should have the fairest lass in all the land badge. Can we work on getting this done?

 

Title: Rewrite Limericks in Prose | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Stony Brook NLP [A2CMT426AYB58X] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.00] [Fast: 0.00] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 0.00] [Reviews: 2] [ToS: 1] TO 2: Not Available Description: Please convert three short poems into non-poetic text. Time: 1 hour HITs Available: 49 Reward: $0.25 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThan 500;

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.20.3​

 

Now that it shows up ...you scare me