05/18 - Splendid Saturday!

Seth Ketron [A1EK7AAKU6WII6] Perceptions of a Product (approx. 2 minutes) - $0.25 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$20.45 / hour
00:00:44 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 500; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location EqualTo US;

To read Seth Ketron's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

JChen [AETP3R47DVN9R] Perception of Groups(~ 10 minutes) - $0.75 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$39.13 / hour
00:01:09 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Exc: [215869087-146985] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location In US;

To read JChen's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Seth Ketron [A1EK7AAKU6WII6] Perceptions of a Product (approx. 2 minutes) - $0.25 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$37.50 / hour
00:00:24 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 500; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location EqualTo US;

To read Seth Ketron's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Derek J Koehler [AN8LXOVUSVKGB] Investigating Moral Judgments!(~ 7 minutes) - $0.75 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$27.27 / hour
00:01:39 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Exc: [291234398-147525] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location In US;

To read Derek J Koehler's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Javan Martin [A13RN3XLOTM8EM] Enter an email address from an image - $0.05 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$25.71 / hour
00:00:07 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications:

To read Javan Martin's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

John Schwenkler [A3QBMM0WED1UUQ] Answer questions about a short story - $0.20 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$22.50 / hour
00:00:32 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 0; HIT approval rate (%) > 95;

To read John Schwenkler's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Title: Judgment and decision-making study | Accept Requester: Charlene Zhang [A3D9D3YCDVBV5T] Contact TV: [Hrly=$12.75] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=Unrated] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=4.50] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=5] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 10.00 Duration: 6:00:00 Available: 1 Description: Answer a survey about judgment and decision-making, your personality, and your experiences in school and work Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.6.12​

Time to jump into this hell

 

Title: Answer a survey about people that really bother you | PANDA
Requester: Dr. Katherine Aumer [A3LFCLSGKDPQP1]
TurkerView: [ $14.93 / hour ]
Description: Tell us about something that really bothers you and your friends
Duration: 15 Min
Available: 0
Reward: $0.25
Qualifications:

• Location EqualTo US,

[3980ZKT3L0T1QL69TRBA8G7Q0KTKMC]​

 

Title: Answer questions about categories. (~ 8 minutes) | PANDA
Requester: Yale Cognition & Development Lab [A1B2ILT2409W4R]
TurkerView: [ $17.62 / hour ]
Description: Make judgments about function
Duration: 30 Min
Available: 0
Reward: $1.00
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100,
• Exc: [-842880945-147571] DoesNotExist
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95,
• Location In US,

[3YNVUE9H9AINZZP5NM83RJO12SHW06]​

 

I'm too slow on those, especially when there are numerous overlapping objects to box, or when they want pixel-perfect precision e.g. 'leave about 3 pixels on each side' — I always try to be ultra-precise about that, but my mouse-fu is teh slow. I'm spending too much time for what, 1, 2, maybe 3 cents?

The Math ones were great, 10 cents and NOT requiring high precision.

 

I think Matt-bot just brought home @ThisPoorGuy to troll me.

"I heard you like to bake bread. Me too! Those crescent rolls are so easy to make! Have you tried the french bread? So good! "

 

WSOP kicking off next week. Who is going to Vegas to try and make his or her Turking career a thing of the past?

 

or a thing of the future most likely

 

srsly check the instructions on every different type of bounding-box hit. Some of them are asking for high precision (e.g. 'leave about 3 pixels on each side'), others don't care about that much precision.

 

... I mean hopefully those bounding-box hits usually won't reject ... but when they ASK for high precision, I want to either give it to them or skip/return.

 

But the Math ones can be fairly quick to do ... their example image seems to indicate they did NOT require high precision ... (unlike the worst of the other types of box hits that sometimes require several boxes asking for almost pixel-perfect precision like '3 pixels on each side' for like 2 or 3 cents. Those are bad).

 

Underpaid

 

Y'r right of course ... yet I maintain that the really egregious ones are those that ask for nearly pixel-perfect precision on multiple objects for like 2 or 3 cents ... THOSE are the worst of the recent box hits IMO.