12/08 - Wild Wintry Weather Wednesday

Teodor A. [A2OW59O6H66NN7] Check quantity discount - $0.30 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$14.03 / hour
00:01:17 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: Masters Exists ; Location EqualTo US;

To read Teodor A.'s full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Arani Roy [A2M42KZ1N0XHHK] Short study on shopping behvavior(~ 8 minutes) - $1.00 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$7.61 / hour
00:07:53 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: Location In CA, GB, US; Total approved HITs >= 1000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 93; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Exc: [38603420-335398] DoesNotExist ;

To read Arani Roy's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Isaac Vaghefi [A32FJEQ2AF4QLV] Covid19 contact-tracing app use(~ 10 minutes) - $2.00 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$19.73 / hour
00:06:05 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: Masters Exists ; Exc: [10526990-335399] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs >= 50; HIT approval rate (%) >= 90; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;

To read Isaac Vaghefi's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

NerdLab Lab Group [ATMRMLDNGYDJT] A study about your perception!(~ 3 minutes) - $0.45 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$24.92 / hour
00:01:05 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 9 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Exc: [-836411843-335391] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;

To read NerdLab Lab Group's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Title: Consumer Health Survey(~ 5 minutes) | PANDA
Requester: Survey_Requester [A32EMLIBRZ99FZ]
TurkerView: [ $19.41 / hour ]
Description: Survey about health and related perceptions
Duration: 60 Min
Available: 39
Reward: $0.65
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100
• Exc: [10749763-335406] DoesNotExist
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 94
• CR Research Group #1 GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100
• Location In US

[3GZMSD8U5XHFL1S1HZXDHKY1XYI95T]​

 

Guys I could throw up. Seriously. Two different jobs tonight have just vanished on me while using Queuebicle. One was from Jennifer Senta for $12 and I was 97% done when it vanished. I have no way to access the work I already did and I'm not confident I will get a reply from the email I sent her. The second one was from Gustavo something or another about Political Statements for $7.50. I was almost done with that one as well. I have no way to email that requestor unless anyone can help me with that email address? Neither one had an expired timer. I just feel sick about it. Honestly.

 

Mohin [A10RLPMKYATS7D] Short survey (~4 minutes)(~ 4 minutes) - $0.50 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$28.57 / hour
00:01:03 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 11 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Exc: [335975-335386] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs >= 500; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;

To read Mohin's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

With Gustavo look them up on Turkerview, look at their hits that they have posted it sounds like the one you were talking about: Gustavo F Novoa requester id:AB36WO33O68Z8

 

I have no experience with Queuebicle, so can't help with that, but here's Gustavo's contact link if that helps.

https://worker.mturk.com/contact_re..._type_message[requester_name]=Gustavo F Novoa

The hit was reviewed just a few posts before yours if you want to access the link from the Turkerview review page.

 

Title: Consumer Health Survey(~ 5 minutes) | PANDA
Requester: Survey_Requester [A32EMLIBRZ99FZ]
TurkerView: [ $19.50 / hour ]
Description: Survey about health and related perceptions
Duration: 60 Min
Available: 1
Reward: $0.65
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100
• Exc: [10749763-335406] DoesNotExist
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 94
• CR Research Group #1 GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100
• Location In US

[3GZMSD8U5XHFL1S1HZXDHKY1XYI95T]​

 

Survey_Requester [A32EMLIBRZ99FZ] Consumer Health Survey(~ 5 minutes) - $0.65 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$20.35 / hour
00:01:55 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: one minute ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Exc: [10749763-335406] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 94; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;

To read Survey_Requester's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Title: Answer a survey about e-bikes | PANDA
Requester: Dan R [AYI99CWDTIEIV]
TurkerView: [ N/A ]
Description: Give us your opinion about e-bikes and our products
Duration: 60 Min
Available: 1
Reward: $1.00
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 98
• Total approved HITs GreaterThan 50

[3Y6OYEUGEHNH0102J6NS98P3TUTS5I]​

 

That is crazy! I messaged Jennifer in the past and she sent me a reply. Let me know if you want her email.

 

YES! YES! YES! Thank you so much. Hopefully, they will honor the work I did...we shall see!!!

 

Jia [A2VJF44K4TJC6L] Research experiment (a series of tasks) - $7.00 | PANDA

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$19.76 / hour
00:21:15 / completion time

​

Pros:
5 independent tasks, each with instructions. After the first task there is a questionnaire with a writing prompt. Demographics also come after the first task. All other tasks follow each other and take various lengths of time.

Cons:
Writing x1. All in the mturk iframe. Time events.

Demographics after the first task gives false hope.

Warns about breaking the experiment and not getting paid. Basically do not hit any button other the buttons they provide.

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 14 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 1000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 97; Location EqualTo US;

To read Jia's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Survey_Requester [A32EMLIBRZ99FZ] Consumer Health Survey(~ 5 minutes) - $0.65 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$37.74 / hour
00:01:02 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 10 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Exc: [10749763-335406] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 94; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;

To read Survey_Requester's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

cmfrieder [A3S9YXZP157MQI] Answer a survey about different consumer products - $0.50 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$40.00 / hour
00:00:45 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 4 minutes ago)
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) > 98; Total approved HITs > 5000; Location EqualTo US;

To read cmfrieder's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Spoiler: Drama with a capital D

Oh, you shouldn't have. Seriously, you really shouldn't have.

\

Clearly outline the process where? Unless you happen to have screenshots of this clear "outline" from the survey, then it is rather irrelevant considering how many people receive rejections.

Little, if any, of this statement is actually relevant to the original statement that was made.

Again, how is this relevant to my original message?

Finding a situation where all the fault lies with a single individual is nigh impossible, yet humanity has still managed to find ways to ascertain who is more blameworthy in a given situation. So please do not play dumb with me as if the majority of the blame doesn't lie with this requester.

I am not sure if you have any experience with higher education, but educational institutions are almost always willing to give professors an extreme level of the benefit of the doubt. And that still does not explain how such a large portion of their data would be unusable.

Just because someone is not as well read as me does not give him (OR YOU for that matter) any reason to talk down to them or negatively about them.

His attitude has aggravated me, yet here you are arguing with me, attempting to chide me for being such a meanie to him. Ironic, isn't it. Like life goes in circles.

Oh, now, there it is. Just because you happened to be one of the lucky ones who happened to win the double code rejection roulette, don't get uppity with me. Do not play as if you do not understand how we all were so "unaware" and all manage to get "perfectly legitimate rejections".

You can take your devil's advocate back to where it belongs.

 

DM me. The fact you reply to me like this is everything!

Edit: MBA for the record