03/24 - Sweet Saturday!

I've used this template for other HITs, in order to pre-select an answer, but it's not working for the CIs. Does anybody know why?

// ==UserScript==
// @name CI
// @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/
// @version 1.0
// @description Select
// @author Justin
// @match https://s3.amazonaws.com/mturk_bulk/hits/307278696*
// @grant GM_log
// @require http://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.1.min.js
// ==/UserScript==
$('input[value="yes"]').click();

 

Try this

// ==UserScript==
// @name CI
// @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/
// @version 1.0
// @description Select
// @author Justin
// @match https://s3.amazonaws.com/mturk_bulk/hits/*
// @grant GM_log
// @require http://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.1.min.js
// ==/UserScript==
$('input[value="yes"]').click();

 

Thanks. That worked.

 

No problem
The difference was the @match, * is a wildcard and I replaced the number after /hits/ with it because every HIT has a different number and so that script would only work with 1 HIT

 

Thats a lot of pennys

 

I don't know much about scripts -- but if the answer is already selected, then why doesn't hitting "enter" submit the HIT?

 

If a radio button (or any non-textarea input) has focus enter will submit the form, otherwise you have to bind enter to click the submit button

 

What CT said

Code:

// ==UserScript==
// @name CI
// @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/
// @version 1.0
// @description Select
// @author Justin
// @match https://s3.amazonaws.com/mturk_bulk/hits/*
// @grant GM_log
// @require http://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.1.min.js
// ==/UserScript==
$('input[value="yes"]').focus();
$('input[value="yes"]').click();

this will work for you

 

Thanks. I appreciate it.

 

Also while learning to code is great, if you're just looking for something that works Kada has a general keybinds script that should be fine for CIs:
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/24650-mturk-radio-keybinds

, has one specific for CIs too though I'm not super sure where that is & honestly too lazy to look lol

 

Morning everyone c:

 

Title: 10-15m survey for plus size women who shop at Nordstrom | Accept Requester: Anton Yakushin [A2YUHENN6UUIX5] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: [Pay: 4.20] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 4.25] [Reviews: 6] [ToS: 0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: $1.25 Duration: 3 hours Available: 1 Description: Help us learn about the Nordstrom clothes that fit you best in your wardrobe. Tell us brand and size for 5 tops/dresses/bottoms. Requirements: Location EqualTo US

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.1.18​

 

Regular keybinds definitely work on CIs. I have ,'s CI one. I can post it, but I thought that was a no go now? Let me know.

 

Title: Decision making task vEG (possible bonus $2.00 and more) | Accept Requester: Yale Institute for Network Science [A2CGQ5942WIRAV] Contact TV: [Hrly: $22.53] [Pay: 4.27] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0] TO: [Pay: 4.15] [Fast: 4.89] [Comm: 4.24] [Fair: 4.91] [Reviews: 204] [ToS: 0] TO2: [Hrly: ---] [Pen: ---] [Res: ---] [Rec: ---] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $2.00 Duration: 30 minutes Available: 1 Description: Perform a decision making task with other Mechanical Turk workers. To complete this HIT, you will participate in several iterations of a game. The HIT will take 10-30 minutes in total to complete. Please allow enough time to fully complete this task. If you accept this HIT you will have to fully participate in the task in order to get paid. Note that this game requires an exact number of workers. If we recruit too many or too few workers you will be paid the basic reward but the game will not begin. We do not allow repeat workers; if you have worked on a HIT titled "Decision making task vEG” and the game began, you will be asked to return the HIT. Requirements: None

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.1.18​

 

Most of his scripts are fine since he no longer has access to his GF account. The Voldemort rule is mostly just so people don't poke fun at a guy who can no longer defend himself here since then it bleeds over into reddit bullshit & blah de blah de blah lol. Plus its just petty. But still, removing access to useful tools because of personality disagreements doesn't make sense / isn't cool / whatevahs.

OTOH if he went "yo fork TH I don't want my stuff posted there" I might (probably) respect that much of a request given it is "his" but to my knowledge that hasn't happened

 

I have no clue what this is from but if that lady's face isn't the epitome of a red flag idk what is. And I know exactly zero straight guys who would see the signs until their car was on fire anyway

 

Can confirm. Make that face all the time, dudes are still shocked when I burn their shit down for insulting my cat.

 

don't know who wrote this one but got it off of Greasy Fork this morning and it has been working fine
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/2...roduct-interest-keyword-relevance-audit-mturk

 

@rdaneel did that one