04/29 - Mole Monday

I may have to settle for tomorrow. We sat up front last time. I want to be a few rows back lol

 

Oh see, that's just it, I'm not talking about her or calling her that. I was only talking about the term of gold digger and why someone who meets that term would want to go about digging further.

I have no fucking clue who this lady is, and I've never seen aquaman so

 

Title: Evaluate and Improve Software Documentation [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Justin M. [AZMEDGPGDXNDT]
TurkerView: [ $ / hour ]
Description: Workers will read and apply different forms of software documentation for the R language. We will ask them for suggestions on how to improve the documentation for its users.
Duration: 00:00:00
Available: 0
Reward: $10.00
Qualifications:

• Employment Industry - Software & IT Services EqualTo 1, [ Request | How to Use ]

[3UEL82N5TO64YQZNLP0OE245104NT2]​

 

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amber-heard-donates-to-charity-as-promised_n_5accf055e4b0a2e354804686

Why do we think a gossip column isn't gonna go for maximum juicy gossip or that a contentious divorce isn't gonna get twisted in the news? We have legit no idea what happened behind the scenes and I wouldn't deign to assume I know.




It's not that she objected to charity, she objected to him changing the terms, which I would have too.

 

I say I would be happy with 100 rejects right now because yes.. that would suck, and I will learn a terrible lesson but 100 rejects would leave me over 99% and will not nuke my account... all I care about right now is that my account does got nuked and I can learn my lesson and keep working.. but I am hoping that they spot rejected and the rest will AA and me leaving these sit in my queue will have saved me from this not spending enough time BS.

 

I don't really give that many hoots. I'm just always confused by people so intent on demonizing someone they've never met. I'll browse me some gossip to burn time, but hoo boy, I don't get the hatred boner thing.

I didn't think you were tho, I was just commenting lol.

 

Oops, I was giving you the thumbs up... Don't trust the old lady on her phone!!

 

Matthew Farmer [A1Z945C11917XB] 3 minute study - Desktop Only(~ 3 minutes) - $0.40 | PANDA

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$16.94 / hour
00:01:25 / completion time

​

Pros:
read a spoopy scenario and answer some questions about it

Cons:

Qualifications: Exc: [1670733542-143675] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 90; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1; Location In US;

To read Matthew Farmer's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Wow. Hatred boner. Thems mighty strong words. Never said I hated her. However, whatever floats ya boat that's fine. I just calls em likes I sees em. No hate here.

 

/incel/

 

KEEP TRYING!

 

I'm out of the loop, too. ... But I just Googled ... Wow, the dark side of the MeToo movement. He was never convicted and he maintains his innocence as far as all that domestic stuff. But, I'll tell ya, it's hard to conversate with someone about the fact that Johnny Depp is a badass--because he is, that's just science--without the person mentioning that domestic abuse case. Problem is, allegation never matured into conviction; and there's a huge-ass difference between the two; but have a talk with someone about the fact that Johnny Depp is a badass--because he is-- and I'll wager that early on that person will bring up the allegations, without using the word "allegation", and will go on to talk about it as if there were, in fact, convictions, which there weren't.

 

A 720 hour timer, lol.

 

Vandy JDM Lab [A3F2YSBKIALMT8] Decisions about consumer products and gambles(~ 5 minutes) - $1.00 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$51.43 / hour
00:01:10 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Exc: [4615719-143690] DoesNotExist ; Location In US;

To read Vandy JDM Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

It takes two to tango.
edit:: posted the wrong gif lol

 

because we all know that if there was no conviction it couldn't possibly be true....

I won't say it was, but to dismiss it as false simply due to the fact that there was no conviction is just as foolhardy as asserting it's truth...possibly more so.