08/29 - Wookiee Wednesday!

Title: Psychology study: play a card game and complete a survey (~1 hour) | PANDA
Requester: BLAM Lab @ Yale [A1HOK7EY8010WS]
TurkerView: [ $13.33 / hour ]
Description: This is a 2-part study where you will play a kind of card game and then answer questions about your beliefs and emotions. Mobile devices not allowed. Test #1.1
Duration: 06:00:00
Available: 1
Reward: $6.00
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90
• Location EqualTo US

[39UNKKTVEGVQUJW8MW04DEKYVP4YGI]​

 

Woke up to a rejection from Survey Comet for Narratives, Cognition, and Behavior(≈ 10 minutes). and the feedback just says "Rejected". Thanks, that's super helpful. I feel like every time I get one rejection reversed 2 more pop up.

 

I submitted that Joe Lo even took a couple screen shots. I took care in making sure at the bottom showed the 100/100 has been recorded.

 

You must be another one of those pesky bots.

 

Mine one got approved and paid.. I knew something was up with that survey because on the same day I did another $2.50 survey from SurveyComet and auto-approval right away. I read on TO some people got rejected on narrative surveys.

 

Title: Ethics survey | PANDA
Requester: lauren [A1A0U1RUUXYWX7]
TurkerView: [ $12.13 / hour ]
Description: Give us your opinion about ways to respond to different situations
Duration: 00:30:00
Available: 1
Reward: $0.50
Qualifications:

• Masters Exists
• Location EqualTo US

[3LE9INWSFWEFEATECVROP3AMQ830ML]​

 

It's entirely possible that I screwed something up, but I'm going to email them about it. Just wish they gave a reason for the rejection

 

Mornin sunshines. What'd I miss?

 

Failsafe DOES seem to be broken in that it'll let you submit anything over 90ish saved. (itll hang on a random number above that). But something like only four answers like what's being reported isn't possible.

it's on their end or mturk had a data burp.

 

They need to give better reason for the rejection.
How are we going to make sure it doesnt happen again
if it was an honest mistake.

 

It's because they don't know. They just got a bunch of results that were incomplete and rejected them and now they don't want to payout for them. They're basically not considering it's on their end because they probably didn't change anything and it just broke.

 

What I think, too. The problem appears to be somewhere from submit til when the requester receives the data. It's the middle man. Data enters Amazon's amazing alimentary canal and doesn't come out the other end. No amount of squeezing helps.

 

I remember there were AC questions..maybe look it up over your iframe to see where did you miss it up.

 

Even if that's the case, we have seen some of their messages relayed to us here, and if they are true, right now they have officially become scary...not rejection scary, account scary

 

Completely agree. I aint touching those things with a ten foot pole. They already sent me two rejects the other day and it's funny because it was the first time I've even done them in forever.

 

Title: Answer a 5-7 minute psychology survey for $0.70 [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Lenny Vartanian [AT3WWH9DBCFPW]
TurkerView: [ $11.06 / hour ]
Description: You will first be asked to visualize a scenario and answer some questions about it. You will then be asked some questions about your opinions. The survey should take approximately 5-7 minutes to complete.
Duration: 01:00:00
Available: 44
Reward: $0.70
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThan 1000,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95,
• Location EqualTo US,

[3LIIZRDE74I3DOTWJQV23X9V0LZTY6]​

 

Morning fam, cant even grab a 30c hit this morning

 

All purpose this morning on PANDA.

 

lauren [A1A0U1RUUXYWX7] Ethics survey - $0.50 | PANDA

[3LE9INWSFWEFEATECVROP3AMQ830ML]​

Low

Unrated

Unrated

$8.22 / hour
00:03:39 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
Have to explain answers
Too much writing for 50c

To read lauren's full profile check out TurkerView!​