12/04 - Frosty Friday

Can someone point me in the direction of the Suzy Park MASS REJECTION discussion, if one has started yet. thanks.

 

Kouchaki Lab [AITD5UBMZDT0Q] Policy Preferences(~ 4 minutes) - $0.40 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$7.70 / hour
00:03:07 / completion time

​

Pros:
Limited bubbles

Cons:
Lots o'reading

Catchability: Impossible (HIT Last Seen: 13 hours ago)
Qualifications: c0594434 DoesNotExist ; Exc: [2011592555-261770] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location In US;

To read Kouchaki Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Elizabeth Keenan [A2AWX5DYMGDYX2] Short Academic Survey (~3 minutes)(~ 4 minutes) - $0.45 | PANDA

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$12.46 / hour
00:02:10 / completion time

​

Pros:
Good!

Cons:

Catchability: Impossible (HIT Last Seen: 13 hours ago)
Qualifications: Exc: [257443-261828] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs >= 5000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; Location In US;

To read Elizabeth Keenan's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

@ChrisTurk

 

what happened

 

<frantically checking if I got any rejections>

 

Duke Cognition Lab [A21FL5HD762HVK] Making Piles - $1.80 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$45.63 / hour
00:02:22 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: 4 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 100; HIT approval rate (%) > 98; CogLab_Repeat DoesNotExist ; Location EqualTo US;

To read Duke Cognition Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

She rejected the whole batch because she believed she received dishonest data.

 

I never even saw the batch, but sometimes requesters get wrong data if the instructions leave a lot of room for confusion, or often if they write a wall of instructions instead of posting a lot of examples. maybe the requester could reverse the rejections and assign/pull quals instead. also any time there's a batch, they should really monitor the results the entire time so they can spot problem workers much faster and stop them. if she's new, maybe she doesn't know all that.

 

What kind of HIT was it?

 

It was one of those "you are the juror' ones.

This is the exact wording of the rejection-"Rejecting entire batch due to widespread dishonesty and untrustworthiness in data"

I have already disputed it.

 

What happened with those?

Spoiler: Also...

Suzy Park could reject me any day

Edit: oh I see your response

 

Ahh shit, now I have to go check. I like those ones. Last one I did.. well I guess I'm not allowed to talk about it, pretty sure that was part of the HIT.

Edit: if it was anything since 11/21 I didn't get a reject. Bummer for anyone affected.

 

This one dropped on December 3rd.

 

I'm on pending for that one then.
Edit: Put good effort on that one, I could recite the details lol

 

Do you have her name in your list of HITS pending?

 

The Jury one I did that day was by Empirical Jury.

 

You're safe then.
This one is just called Suzy Park.

 

Ok, good to know. I'm only now getting into more of the nuance and details of it all that so many around here seem to know. Still bummer for all involved and not a name I will soon forget as I assume most jury hits are time consuming.

 

They are time consuming, especially if you're actually reading all the text and not just skimming and then when you get a reject, it burns...plus it's a $5.00 HIT! I can buy a whole bag of dark roast coffee from Trader Joe's with that, all HITS I do, I do in terms of what I can buy at Trader Joe's with that amount, it helps me get through them.